Best triathlon sunglasses reviewed in 2025
The best triathlon sunglasses will divert blazing sun, blustery wind, bugs and more from your vision on the bike and run. Here are our top picks

A pair of the best triathlon sunglasses can make all the difference to your performance when competing in bright conditions. Not only do they do the job of running sunglasses, they’re also optimised for cycling and are designed to offer great versatility for all your triathlon training and racing.
Triathlon sunglasses give that über professional look, along with eye protection against harsh glare that will also help you squint less and conserve precious energy.
And that’s not all – they’ll also protect you from wind, bugs and dirt flying through the air, and can even improve the clarity of your vision.
Scroll down to see our pick of the best triathlon sunglasses on the market right now, tried and tested by our expert gear reviewers.
Why you can trust 220 Triathlon
Our team of experts rigorously tests each product and provides honest, unbiased reviews to help you make informed decisions. For more details, see how we rate and test products.
Best sunglasses for triathlon
The Smith Optic Motive (buy) sunglasses are high-end and versatile sunglasses that provide good clarity and coverage, while remaining stylish and good value.
The Tifosi Vogel SL (buy) are a comfortable and well-fitting pair of versatile multi-sport sunglasses that offer exceptional value for money.
At just 21g, the Koo Supernova (buy) are a great, lightweight, and comfortable pair of sunnies for tri racing.
The Oakley Sutro (buy) are incredibly robust sunnies that offer great clarity of vision on the bike and run.
Best triathlon sunglasses of 2025
Best overall triathlon sunglasses

1. Smith Motive Sunglasses
220 Triathlon verdict
Great, versatile pair of high-end sunglasses for triathlon that can be worn year-round. Score : 87%
Pros
- Visually stunning
- Good clarity and protection
- Nice level of wind coverage
Cons
- High tint not for dark conditions
- Nose piece niggles
Price | $219 / £150 |
Lens | ChromaPop, interchangeable |
Style | Aviator, wraparound |
Treatment | Stain and moisture resistant |
Case | Hard and soft case included |
The Motive sunglasses combine style and function, with the dual-lens design offering a clear, wide field of view. ChromaPop Opal Mirror lenses enhance colour and clarity, handling bright light well, though shaded areas remain a challenge.
Wind protection and top-frame clearance in aero cycling positions are excellent. The glasses fit pretty comfortably, though the nose piece may press the lenses too close for some.
Priced at $219/£150, they include a hard case and spare lenses for year-round use. RS
Read our full Smith Motiv review here
Best value triathlon sunglasses

2. Tifosi Vogel SL
220 Triathlon verdict
You get a lot for the money, but there are a few compromises. Score: 80%
Pros
- Impressive value
- Clarity in bright conditions
Cons
- Not complete coverage
Price | $39.95 / £54.99 |
Lens | Shatterproof, optically decentered polycarbonate |
Style | Shield, wraparound |
Case | No case included |
Tifosi’s entry into this test goes head-to-head with Madison for the best value gong, with its price of $40/£55 looking very attractive.
The Vogel SL gets off to a good start, too, its frameless design delivering a largely unimpeded view, but the lens does cut off quite early at the bottom, which is sometimes in view.
It’s also worth noting that at times, particularly when looking over the shoulder, the points where the arms connect to the lens do cut into the view.
The smoke lens is great in bright conditions, bit a little on the dark side on gloomy or shaded outings. There’s a reasonable boost of contrast to help you spot details on the ground, too.
Given the smaller lens profile, some wind can bypass the glasses, particularly on fast sections of road, but the fit is secure and comfort is high. There’s no case, though. RS
Best lightweight triathlon sunglasses

3. Koo Supernova
220 Triathlon verdict
Very light and flexible, but a little too large. Score: 80%
Pros
- Incredibly lightweight
- Impressive lens performance
Cons
- Fit is a little loose
Price | $200 / £170 |
Lens | Shatterproof, Nylon toric lens by Zeiss® |
Style | Shield, wraparound, frameless |
Treatment | Anti-reflective, mirror coating, hydrophobic technology |
Case | Soft and hard case included |
Weighing in at only 21g, the fact that these sunnies are extremely light and flexible are the first thing you notice when you slide them on.
They did feel a little large/wide for this female tester, and I preferred the more secure feel of the Sungods. The arms could have done with being a little grippier, too, though again, you get a choice of nose bridges.
Six different lens/frame combos are available and the green lenses supplied here are suited to sunny days and light cloud, which I felt performed well during a sunny test weekend.
On the flip side, they are expensive for eyewear that can’t be used on gloomier days. Range of vision was superb, though. HW
Best coverage triathlon sunglasses

4. Oakley Sutro
220 Triathlon verdict
Robust sunnies with great clarity and coverage. Score: 87%
Pros
- Lens enhances colours and contrasts incredibly well
- Comfortable and secure fit
Cons
- This lens choice isn’t the most versatile and can feel a little dark
Price | $192 / £159 |
Lens | Prizm ™ lenses |
Style | Large lens, high-bridge, full frame |
Case | Soft and hard case included |
Using Oakley’s Prizm Road lenses, the Sutros are designed to enhance colour, contrast and detail, which they did with aplomb, while the level of clarity and field of view is impressive.
Having said that, in darker conditions or dappled light, they can feel a little dark, though other lenses are available when purchasing.
The complete-frame design ensures durability but impacts ventilation a little during hard sessions. Comfort is good, with the nose bridge and arms providing a secure fit, but rubber grips on the arm tips would’ve been a welcomed addition.
The lofty 56.7mm-high lenses provide ample coverage but may feel a little too large for some. RS

5. Madison Code Breaker II
220 Triathlon verdict
A great entry-level option that offers a lot of value for money. Score: 75%
Pros
- Fantastic value for money
- Spare lenses and hard case
Cons
- Wind can get through vents
- Some movement when running
Price | £59.99 (UK only) |
Lens | Polycarbonate lens, 3 interchangeable lenses |
Style | Shield, wraparound |
Case | Hard case included |
The Code Breaker sunglasses are among the cheapest sunglasses on test and they punch above their fiscal weight, yet there are some flaws…
Lens performance was decent, but not perfect. The cat three tinted lens is designed for bright conditions, but it struggled when riding toward a low-slung sun, while clarity and contrast is not as pronounced as other options.
The field of vision is perfectly acceptable, though, even when riding in an aero position, while the glasses felt secure and comfortable in most conditions.
That being said, there was a bit of movement in run sessions. Large vents help fend off fogging but can allow wind to get through to your eyes on occasion.
Impressively, the glasses also come with a clear lens and category one amber lens for darker conditions, plus a hard case. RS

6. BBB Cycling Chester
220 Triathlon verdict
A versatile option, but not the most secure and other lenses perform better. Score: 70%
Pros
- Attractive price
- Good coverage
Cons
- Fit wasn’t the most secure
- Frame is sometimes visible in field of view
Price | £99.99 (UK only) |
Lens | Polycarbonate, photochromatic, Toric lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound,full frame |
Treatment | MLC coating |
Case | Soft case |
While almost half the price of some options, £100 is still a lot of money to spend, so does the Chester live up to its price tag?
Well, I found them a little uninspiring to look at. BBB has gone for a hybrid frameless/full frame design, with the frame sitting behind the lens.
In effect, I didn’t notice much difference to a standard full-frame design, with the bumpers often visible in my peripheral vision.
The large lens delivers good protection from the wind and its photochromic nature (VLT is 82-17%) means it adapts to light conditions, but I did find myself squinting a bit on the brightest of days when riding toward the sun. It doesn’t noticeably boost road details, either.
The fit wasn’t perfect for me at the nose, even after adjusting the nose piece, and the glasses tended to slide downward on test runs and rides.
The lack of hard case also sees points docked. RS
Buy now from SunGod

7. Sungod Velans TF
220 Triathlon verdict
We love the range of options, plus they’re light and comfy. Score: 88%
Pros
- Customisation when buying is a plus
- Fantastic visibility
- Fit was great
Cons
- Little to fault
Price | $160 / £130 |
Lens | 8KO spherical lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound, half frame |
Treatment | Triple-layer scratch protection |
Case | Hard case |
Choice and adaptability are key in this sleek design. That TF in the name stands for ‘top frame’ and cleverly, the Velans are also available in FF (full frame, $180/£150), which gives you a removable bottom ‘jaw’.
These get my vote, though, as visibility was excellent with a good, clear range of vision and no misting.
They fit this female tester well (three nose bridges supplied) and didn’t feel too over-designed like some in the current sports-sunnies market.
The gold lenses supplied gave sharpness and clarity on a freak sunny March weekend, as well as in dappled light, though 12 lens tints and multiple frame colours are available. HW

8. Bollé Shifter
220 Triathlon verdict
A solid offering from Bolle, but price bracket means it has stiff competition. Score: 80%
Pros
- Lens performance is decent
- Fit securely and deliver great field of vision
Cons
- Price puts it in top bracket
- Frame sometimes comes into view
Price | $200 / £180 |
Lens | Photochromic, Volt+ lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound, full frame |
Treatment | Anti-fog, scratch resistant |
Case | Hard case |
That’s a hefty price, but is the Bolle Shifter worth it? Like the Oakley BiSphaera, the Shifter comes with a grey tinted lens and is designed to protect against bright light, with a VLT of 15%.
It does that job well, and is also perfectly acceptable in dappled light overcast days. That Volt+ lens does a fine job of boosting contrasts and enhancing colours, while clarity was also decent.
The glasses sit quite close to the face, so there’s no issue with wind or airborne debris getting into your eyes, while the fit is secure and comfortable.
Field of vision is also very good thanks to the large size, with no issues when in an aero position on the bike.
That said, the bottom half of the frame can occasionally be a distraction, particularly given the bright yellow colourway shown here.
A hard case comes included.
- How to prepare for racing in hot weather
- How hot weather affects your body and your ability to train and race
- Best electrolyte drinks tablets reviewed
- Energy gels: how they work and when to take them
- Why do I get itchy skin when I sweat?

9. Van Rysel RoadR Perf 900
220 Triathlon verdict
Good value, but lacking in comfort and lens performance is just okay. Score: 70%
Pros
- Good price
- Large range of vision
- Decent lens performance
Cons
- Coverage and protection isn’t perfect
Price | £59.99 (UK only) |
Lens | Polyamide lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound, full frame |
Treatment | Scratch-proof treatment |
Case | No case |
Here’s another budget-friendly option from Decathlon’s Van Rysel. The Roadr Perf 900 comes with classic cycling glasses styling, with that large lens ensuring a fantastic field of view.
Our test pair came in the translucent colourway, which I did find slightly distracting when it caught the sun at the bottom of the frame. The fit is mostly secure, with only a minor bit of movement when testing during run sessions.
While not exactly uncomfortable, these sunglasses don’t deliver the same level of comfort as many others on test, with the nose piece and arms feeling too firm for my liking.
The lens did a reasonable job in a range of light conditions, but was mid-pack for its performance in bright light, while there wasn’t much in the way of a boost to clarity or contrasts.
Protection from wind and airborne nasties is largely okay, but the lenses do sit a reasonable distance away from the face, so it isn’t infallible. There’s no case, either.

10. Rudy Project Kelion
220 Triathlon verdict
A great option for triathlon, but hard to ignore that high price tag. Score: 83%
Pros
- Incredible coverage from the large lens
- Photochromic lens delivers versatility
- Hard case included
Cons
- Lens doesn’t boost contrasts as well as some others
Price | $219.90 / £208.99 |
Lens | ImpactX 2Laster Black, photochromic |
Style | Shield, wraparound, full frame |
Case | Hard case |
That is some price, so the Kelions better be worth it. Luckily, they have a lot going for them. The field of view delivered by 62mm-high lens is exceptional, as is the protection this gives you from wind, bugs and the like.
The lens featured in my test pair is the brand’s ImpactX 2Laster Black. It’s a photochromic option with 62-13% of VLT, meaning it’s versatile enough to work on gloomy days as well as sunny ones.
Its performance when riding toward the sun was decent, but was just pipped by Oakley BiSphaera. The Kelion doesn’t boost contrasts quite as well as one of two other pairs on test, either.
Comfort was high, but the arms may feel a little tight for some, depending on your head shape. The nose piece is adjustable and all things considered, the glasses felt very secure throughout testing.
The inclusion of a hard case is appreciated, as is the use of sustainable material Rilsan in the glasses’ build.

11. Alba Optics Stratos
220 Triathlon verdict
Great arms and low weight, but better lenses on test. Score: 70%
Pros
- Very lightweight
- Lack of frame means uninterrupted field of view
Cons
- No alternative nose pieces
- Questions about durability
Price | $179.68 / £145.89 |
Lens | VZUM™ lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound, no frame |
Treatment | Ventilated for anti-fog |
Case | Soft case |
Handmade in Italy and a featherlight weight of 30g are two instant appeals of the Stratos, the latter due to the pair lacking a main frame.
That gave me concerns over durability, especially in the chaos of transition come race day, but they come close to the Roka in their near-invisible run prowess.
In terms of adjustability, there’s no replacement nose piece (you can opt for an ‘Asian Fit’ nose pad when purchasing), but the arms have four different length options, a neat feature for added grip on the run.
There’s an interchangeable lens but no spares are provided. MB

12. Roka GP-1X
220 Triathlon verdict
Add an extra lens for low light and these would be best on test. Score: 83%
Pros
- Great field of vision
- Super lightweight and high performance
- Multiple nose pieces included
Cons
- Massive price tag
Price | $240 / £230 |
Lens | C3i™ lenses and coatings |
Style | Shield, wraparound, bottom frame |
Treatment | ANSI Z87+ High Impact Certified, anti-scratch, anti-fog, hydrophobic and oleophobic lens coatings |
Case | Hard and soft case |
Roka has strong pedigree in performance eyewear and its products have been worn by Ironman World Champ Lucy Charles-Barclay for a number of years.
The brand’s offering here comes with one large single category three lens, which delivers 12% of VLT. They look sleek and that lens offers very good performance on the brightest of days, but feels a little dark when the clouds come in or you’re riding through woodland.
There’s no spare lens to counteract that, either, which would have been nice for this price. The field of view is brilliant, though, and the large size means there’s no wind, bugs or dust getting through.
They’re extremely comfortable, but I did experience a slight hint of movement during testing. Four nose pieces are included to help counteract this, though the arms aren’t as tight as many competitors. You do get a case, though. RS

13. Sungod Vulcans FF
220 Triathlon verdict
Durable and secure, but no spare lens. Score: 87%
Pros
- Fantastic lens performance
- Excellent coverage
- Full frame offers solid durability
Cons
- No spare lens
Price | $190/£160 |
Lens | 8KO Nylon lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound, full frame |
Treatment | Hydroleophobic lens protection |
Case | Hard and soft case |
The Vulcans come in two modes: the TF (top frame, $170/£140) and the FF (full frame, $190/£160) here, which sees the frame extending under the lenses for added durability.
That move does see the weight increase by 5g to 37g, but it still wasn’t an issue on the run. Unlike Sungod’s debut Pacebreakers, the Vulcans provide a huge amount of facial coverage without a noticeable gap.
But it’s the lens that really excels here, offering versatility and fog-free riding in a variety of changeable conditions. You don’t receive a spare lens, but the custom options are extensive. MB

14. Scicon Sports Aerowing
220 Triathlon verdict
Great pair but there’s a knack to swapping the lens. Score: 89%
Pros
- Interchangeable lenses
- Impressive coverage and field of view
- Great adjustability
Cons
- Tricky to swap lenses
Price | $170/£125 |
Lens | Polycarbonate, interchangeable mono lens |
Style | Shield, wraparound, half frame |
Treatment | Hydrophobic, mirror coating, oleophobic coating |
Case | Hard and soft case |
The large shield design of the 33g Aerowing is on-trend, giving both wide facial coverage and an obstructed view on the hoods (part of the top frame creeps into the vision on the tri-bars, though).
Adjustability is best in class, with the nose pieces offering horizontal and vertical movement; the arms can be bent and reinforced to secure the desired level of grip and flexibility; and a series of venting channels prevent fogging.
We didn’t feel fully confident swapping out the lenses for the included clear pair, though – not ideal when the outlay is $170/£125. MB
How we tested
All of the sunglasses featured here have been tested by 220‘s expert gear reviewers, which includes editor Helen Webster, former features editor (and now editor of CountryFile) Matt Baird and content editor Rob Slade.
Between the three of them they have over 35 years of experience testing kit.
When rating the best triathlon sunglasses, we considered fit, comfort, performance in bright light, versatility in different lighting conditions, field of vision, clarity, value, protection against wind and airborne debris, plus the lenses ability to avoid fogging up.
If we rate a product with a score of 90% or more, it means we are mightily impressed and it’s hard to find fault. Anything scoring between 80-89% is also incredibly impressive and among the best on the market.
A score of 70-79% means the product is worth considering, as it does some stuff well, but it will also have a couple of flaws. Anything below 70% is likely to have one or two major issues, or a series of smaller ones, so consider if they bother you before thinking about buying.
What to look for in the best triathlon sunglasses
UVA rating – When shopping for a new pair of sunnies, go for one with a high UVA rating to protect your corneas from sun damage, even if you just race in the UK.
Lens – Like some of the glasses here, many brands will supply multiple interchangeable lenses, so you can adapt the choices depending on variable lighting conditions. This versatility is useful when cloudy days call for a lighter lens or if a sun-drenched course requires a darker pair to provide adequate clarity.
Photochromatic lens – Recent years have seen the introduction of the photochromatic lens, which becomes darker when exposed to high UV rays. Changing out these lenses can be a precarious task, however, so a durable frame is essential.
Style – While this type of eyewear summons references to obscure ’80s pop bands, the visor-style, wraparound lens shape does offer the best performance advantage as it optimises the field of vision and coverage.
Frame – On this note, options without a top frame can be useful if you plan to be riding on your clip-on aerobars or a triathlon bike, as otherwise it can impede vision. A sturdy frame that sits close to the eyes is also desirable to help with windchill on the ride, while incorporated vents and an anti-fog coating are lifesavers when huffing and puffing through T2 onto the run.
Fit – Finally, to reduce the chance of your sunglasses bouncing on the fly ensure you have a snug fit on the nose bridge and silicon grippers along the arms, which will also help improve comfort.
What colour lenses are best for triathlon?
When choosing lenses for triathlon training and racing, consider the light conditions and environment you’re likely to be in. Photochromic lenses are ideal in that they adjust to changing light, perfect for early morning starts and varying weather.
For sunny races, polarised lenses reduce glare and improve clarity. While amber lenses enhance contrast, which is great for road visibility. Yellow lenses are good for low-light or cloudy days too.
Clear lenses work well in dark or rainy conditions, and mirrored coatings add extra sun protection. Ultimately, comfort, UV protection, and visibility are key when to comes to choosing triathlon sunglasses.
Pick lenses that offer a wide field of view, are lightweight, and stay fog-free throughout swimming, cycling, and running transitions.
Why do triathletes wear sunglasses?
Triathletes wear sunglasses for protection, performance, and comfort. Sunglasses shield eyes from harmful UV rays, wind, dust, debris, and insects during high-speed cycling and running.
They also reduce glare from water and roads, improving visibility and focus. By minimising squint and eye strain, sunglasses help maintain better concentration and energy.
Quality lenses enhance contrast and clarity, especially in changing light conditions. Many models offer a secure fit, ventilation, and anti-fog features to stay comfortable both while running and cycling.
Don’t need options just for multisport? Take a look at our list of the best running sunglasses for more options.